Ed Friedman v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtMead, J.
[¶ 1] Ed Friedman and others (collectively, Friedman) appeal from an order of the Maine Public Utilities ■ Commission finding that Central Maine Power Company’s (CMP) advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) system poses no credible threat to the health and safety of CMP’s customers., On appeal, Friedman contends that (1) the Commission applied ,an improper standard and burden of proof; (2) the determination was not supported by substantial evidence in the record; and (3) the two Commissioners serving on the panel outlined differing rationales and therefore did not concur in the decision. We…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Central Maine Power Company v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Pine Tree Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Office of the Public Advocate v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- NextEra Energy Resources, LLC v. Maine Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- Maine Coalition to Stop Smart Meters v. Public Utilities Commission et al.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
- FRIEDMAN v. CENTRAL MAINE POWER COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
- General Marine Construction Corporation v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022
- Jennifer Gamage v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021