Legal Opinion
United States v. Bruinier
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 26, 1968PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOLOMON, Chief Judge:
The issues raised by this prosecution for violation of the Military Selective Service Act are the effect of an induction notice which the registrant does not receive and of a subsequent letter to the registrant informing him of the induction notice.
In 1963, at age 17y2, Kenneth William Bruinier left his Lake Oswego, Oregon, home to live with relatives in Holland. On his 18th birthday he reg istered with Selective Service at the United States Consulate in Amsterdam. 1 He returned to the United States in May, 1964, stayed six months, and returned to Holland with his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- David Seymour Graves v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Albert Stain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Warren E. Talcott, Jr. v. George A. Reed, Lt. Col., Inf., Commanding Officer, Los Angeles Recruiting Main Station, United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Carlin Constantine Venus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
3Cited by12 opinions
- Marc Belding Anderson v. General Lewis B. Hershey, National Director, Selective Service SystemCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Ryan v. HersheyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- United States of America Ex Rel. Duncan Randall Kellogg v. Colonel Willie H. McBeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Lawrence Joseph Dell'annoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. LamberdDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.