Legal Opinion
Albert Stain v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 15, 1956No. 14774_1PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
Albert Stain was found guilty (jury waived) of wilfully refusing to submit to induction into the Armed Forces of the United States, Universal Military Training and Service Act, Title 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 462,1 and appeals, claiming the status of conscientious objector.
Appellant first registered under the Selective Service Act on November 6, 1946, but made no claim relative to conscientious objection to war. His local board classified him 1-A and gave notice thereof to him. He took no appeal. In 1947 he notified his board that he had moved to Canada. Subsequently he…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Falbo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Wilbur Leroy RansomCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Jesus M. Olvera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- United States ex rel. La Charity v. Commanding Officer of United States Army Induction CenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
3Cited by41 opinions
- David Bruce Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. BurlichDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Clinton Roy Petrie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Claude James, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- William Creighton Vaughn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.