Legal Opinion

Carlin Constantine Venus v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 17, 1959No. 15953_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.

Venus was indicted for knowingly failing to report for induction into the armed forces of the United States in violation of 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 462(a). 1

Venus registered with Local Board No. 140, in San Diego County, California, on September 15, 1948. There is no need to review the episodes previous to the order here charged, except to note that defendant claimed to be a conscientious objector and on one occasion, before the series of incidents upon which the current indictment was based, obeyed an order to report for induction but refused to be inducted.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. David Seymour Graves v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carlin Constantine Venus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. United States v. BruinierDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1968
  3. United States v. MadsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972
  4. Carlin Constantine Venus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  5. Prospect Capital CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API