Legal Opinion
Foster v. City of Oakland
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 11, 2009No. C-08-01944 EDLPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Michael Foster (“Plaintiff’) filed this action against his former employer, Defendant City of Oakland, and supervisor, Defendant Audree Jones-Taylor (“Defendants”), alleging violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”), and the Califor nia Fair Employment and Housing Act, Cal. Gov.Code § 12900 et seq. (“FEHA”). Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court held a hearing on July 7, 2009.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clifford Merlo v. Robert L. WilkieDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- Gonzalez v. Envoy Mortgage CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Harry D. Richardson v. State of ArizonaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- Janvier v. City Of OaklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Madrigal v. Performance Food Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.