Legal Opinion

Madrigal v. Performance Food Group, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 5, 2021No. 5:21-cv-00021Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 JORGE MADRIGAL, Case No. 21-cv-00021-VKD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 10 v. DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 11 PERFORMANCE TRANSPORTATION, Re: Dkt. No. 9 LLC, 12 Defendant. 13 14 In this action, plaintiff Jorge Madrigal asserts the following claims against defendant 15 Performance Transportation, LLC (“PTL”) asserting: (1) disability discrimination in violation of 16 the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 12969(m) and 12940; (2) 17 failure to accommodate Mr. Madrigal’s…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API