Legal Opinion

United States v. Stan Smith

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 3, 1989No. 88-2817PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Stan Smith appeals from his conviction of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113. Mr. Smith contends that the trial court erred by not giving a cautionary jury instruction regarding the testimony of John Heller, a paid informant and rebuttal witness. After reviewing the trial record, we conclude that even if rejection of the defendant’s instruction was erroneous, any error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because of the substantial evidence identifying Mr. Smith as the bank robber. Therefore, we affirm Mr. Smith’s conviction. Mr. Smith also…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. Manuel OteroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Irma Pena, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Gregory J. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Ervin Earl RutterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Duvalier Antonio DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Benjamin Thomas Tisdale, IIICourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API