Legal Opinion

Harris v. La Quinta

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 19, 1997No. 85777PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice.

Claimant, Jesse J. Harris, worked as head of maintenance for La Quinta (“employer”) at one of its inns. After working overtime one evening the claimant was injured in an automobile collision while driving home. He sought compensation, which the trial tribunal denied for want of an injury arising out of and in the course of employment. The claimant sought review, and the Court of Civil Appeals vacated the order and remanded the claim. The dispositive issue on certiorari is whether the claimant had been performing a special task for the employer before leaving work. We answer…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. R. J. Allison, Inc. v. BolingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Stroud Municipal Hospital v. MooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Max E. Landry, Inc. v. TreadwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Thurston Chemical Company v. CasteelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Weatherbee Electric Company v. DukeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Turner v. B Sew InnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  2. Barnhill v. Smithway Motor ExpressSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Claim of Holliman v. Twister Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. Lucas v. Triad Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. Yzer, Inc. v. RodrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API