Legal Opinion

Sasso v. Osgood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court failed to exercise its review function properly in denying the petition to annul a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Henderson (ZBA). The ZBA granted an area variance to intervenor, the owner of a substandard lot, to enable him to demolish an existing single-slip boathouse and erect a three-slip boathouse in its place. Although local zoning boards have discretion in considering an application for a variance and the judicial function is a limited one (see, Matter of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. O'Keefe v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Vilardi v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MATTER OF SASSO v. OsgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Delavore v. ScheyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Alvord v. Village of Camden Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API