Sasso v. Osgood
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court failed to exercise its review function properly in denying the petition to annul a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Henderson (ZBA). The ZBA granted an area variance to intervenor, the owner of a substandard lot, to enable him to demolish an existing single-slip boathouse and erect a three-slip boathouse in its place. Although local zoning boards have discretion in considering an application for a variance and the judicial function is a limited one (see, Matter of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- O'Keefe v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Vilardi v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by3 opinions
- MATTER OF SASSO v. OsgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Delavore v. ScheyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Alvord v. Village of Camden Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994