Legal Opinion

Alvord v. Village of Camden Zoning Board of Appeals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent Village of Camden Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) granted four variances to respondents Bernard Metott and Delaine Metott for relief from the front and side yard setback requirements, the lot width requirement and the per unit lot area restriction contained in the Village of Camden Zoning Ordinance (zoning ordinance). Petitioner, the owner of adjacent property, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination of the ZBA. Supreme Court dismissed the petition. We affirm.

To be entitled to the four area…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Conley v. Town of Brookhaven Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Jayne Estates, Inc. v. RaynorNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Doyle v. AmsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Sanzone v. City of RomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API