Legal Opinion

Robinson Reduction Co. v. Johnson

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1897No. 1223PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Gilpin County.

1Opinion of the CourtThomson, P. J.

On the 16, day of October, 1894, William Robinson and John E. Greenawalt were the proprietors of inventions and processes for the reduction of metalliferous ores, and the separation of gold and other precious metals from ores. On *136that day they entered into a contract with John W. Stark-weather and William B. Willard, whereby they transferred to the latter an undivided one half interest in the inventions, for certain designated territory, in consideration of $6,000 to be paid by the assignees, and applied under the supervision of the first named parties in the erection of a suitable plant, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Gold Mining Co. v. Rocky Mountain National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1873
  2. Welch v. MayerColorado Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Walsh v. AllenColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Wood v. Wiley Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bowles v. OakmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Gamel v. HyndsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. SchradskySupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  4. Tubbs v. RobertsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API