Board of County Commissioners v. Schradsky
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Campbell
*179This is a suit on,coupons cut from negotiable judgment bonds issued by Labe county. Both the bonds and coupons are payable to bearer. The answer sets up a number of defenses, only two of which :are material upon this appeal. The one is that .the plaintiff is not the real party in interest, but that she took the coupons for the sole purpose of enabling her, ■a non-resident of the state of Colorado, to bring suit upon the same in the United States circuit, court for the district of Colorado, and, therefore, she cannot -maintain an action in the state courts. The other'is that there is a former…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Gordon v. GilfoilSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Bassett v. InmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
- Wonderly v. Lafayette CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Walsh v. AllenColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vigil v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Bell v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
- Asiatic Tunnel Mining & Milling Co. v. StephensonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
- Ballinger v. VatesColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
- Ballinger v. VatesColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.