Legal Opinion

Brownson v. Lewis and Bunnell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

The trial court held that when the sole proprietor of a business took in a partner, who paid $5,000 for his interest, there was a void transfer of assets within the meaning of the bulk sales act. ORS 79.010 to 79.040. The defendant Bunnell, the party who bought the partnership interest, appeals from a decree in favor of Brownson, the plaintiff, who was a creditor of one Lewis, the former sole proprietor.

The first question is whether the bulk sales act applies to a transfer of the kind involved in the case at bar. If it does, then it is necessary to consider whether the record supports the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Oregon Mill & Grain Co. v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Marlow v. RingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hartwig v. RushingOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Watkins v. AngusMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Fitzhugh v. MunnellOregon Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. E. Carl Schiewe, Inc. v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. Norcrest China Co. v. TerryOregon Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API