Legal Opinion

Norcrest China Co. v. Terry

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1972Published

1Opinion of the CourtBbyson, J.

This is a suit to foreclose a mortgage given by the defendants to secure performance of an indemnity agreement. Defendants Stanley G. Terry and Gladys B. Terry appeal from the decree in favor of plaintiff. The facts are as follows: The plaintiff purchased the Norcrest China Building from defendants Terry. At the time of sale there were two judgment liens of record against the defendant Stanley G. Terry: Martin v. Terry, $13,405.53; and Simmons v. Terry, $21,432.02. In connection with the sale, the defendants executed a written indemnity agreement in favor of plaintiff to “protect the above…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Employer's Liability Assurance Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Brownson v. Lewis and BunnellOregon Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API