Legal Opinion

Montanez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided July 28, 2004No. 10-02-00274-CRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

BILL VANCE, Justice.

This is a suppression case.

Appellant, a native of Puerto Rico, does not speak English well. He “consented” to a search of the vehicle he was driving. The definitive issue before us is whether the trial judge, in denying a motion to suppress the evidence, could have found by clear and convincing evidence that Appellant freely and voluntarily consented to the search. We conclude that the answer is “no.”

Appellant and an unrelated passenger, a native of the Dominican Republic who speaks less English than Appellant, both non-residents…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Zuniga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Montanez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Urioso v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. City of Waco v. Kelley, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
  4. City of Waco v. Kelley, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
  5. Juan Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API