Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. Florence

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 13, 1919No. 1022PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Findings .of Fact.

HIGGINS, J.

On March 12, 1918, appellee, Florence, applied to appellant for a “health policy,” and the application signed by him contained a representation that he did not then have and had never had hernia. Upon this application appellant issued its policy, dated May 21, 1918, insuring Florence against “disability resulting from illness which is contracted and begins during the life of this policy, * * * ” and. providing for a monthly illness indemnity of $70. This policy contained a provision which reads:

“The company may cancel this policy at any time by written notice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Benson v. PhippsTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hannay v. W. L. Moody & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  3. Texas & New Orleans Railway Co. v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Central National Ins. Co. of Omaha, Neb.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. ParkeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  4. Shelton v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PierceNebraska Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API