Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Pierce
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 22, 1968No. 36739PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment. The controversy concerns the validity of a driver exclusion agreement executed by the, plaintiff, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and its named insureds, Charles W. Pierce and Elsie R. Pierce.
The agreement in question was an endorsement to a liability policy insuring a 1963 Ford automobile. The policy had been issued for a 8-month period commencing December 5, 1960, and had been renewed for successive 6-month periods by payment of renewal premiums. The policy restricted the plaintiff’s right of cancellation but provided that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. Central National Ins. Co. of Omaha, Neb.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
- Brady v. North Western InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Protective Fire and Casualty Company v. CorneliusNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. FlorenceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Ellis v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hauer v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Workman v. Great Plains Insurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1972
- Blue Bird Body Co. v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HildebrandNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Garza v. Glen Falls InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.