Legal Opinion

Arrow v. Dow

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided August 16, 1982No. 78-434-M CivilPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MECHEM, District Judge.

This matter arises for consideration on cross motions for summary judgment. Defendants are the New Mexico Board of Bar Commissioners, members of the Board and officers of the New Mexico Bar (the Bar). Plaintiffs are members of the Bar who claim that the Bar is depriving them of freedom of speech and association by the use of mandatory Bar dues to lobby for or against legislation in the New Mexico Legislature. Plaintiffs seek restitution of Bar dues spent for lobbying efforts and injunctive relief. Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Railway Employes' Department v. HansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Lathrop v. DonohueSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Schneider v. Colegio De Abogados De Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1982
  2. Keller v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Schneider v. Colegio De Abogados De Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1983
  4. Schneider v. Colegio De Abogados De Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1988
  5. Robinson v. State of NJDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API