Legal Opinion

Boeing Co. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 34876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIM, District Judge.

This is an action by an employer under Section 301(a) of the Labor-Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. § 185(a), for a declaratory judgment that under the terms of the collective bargaining agreement with defendant unions, it was not obligated to arbitrate a dispute arising out of the employer’s decision to locate certain plastic production work at its plant in Wichita, Kansas, rather than at its plant in Morton, Pennsylvania.1

Defendant Unions have filed a counterclaim seeking to compel the employer to arbitrate this dispute. The case is presently before the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. American Auto. Ins. Co. v. Indemnity Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sperry Systems Management Division v. Engineers Union, International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  2. Boeing Company v. INTERNATIONAL U., UNITED A., A. & AI WKRS.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. In re the Arbitration between Rochester Independent Workers & General Dynamics/Electronics DivisionNew York Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API