Legal Opinion

People v. Taylor

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 2009No. E044368PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RAMIREZ, P. J.

INTRODUCTION

Eric Wayne Taylor (Taylor), Robert Landis (Landis), Michael Badura (Badura), Steven Arthur Reynolds (Reynolds), and George Wright (Wright), collectively referred to as defendants, were convicted in separate criminal proceedings of various sexual offenses and were sentenced to state prison. Each was subsequently found to be a sexually violent predator (SVP) at the conclusion of his determinate sentence, and was subjected to civil commitments pursuant to the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA; Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.), 2 prior to November 2006.

Under…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. CastilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. People v. PaniaguaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. People v. AbarcaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API