Haswell v. Costellenos
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, J., pro tem.
The trial of this case was by jury. While the appellant complains of a nonsuit as to certain counts of the complaint there was a judgment, general in its terms, entered in favor of defendant surety company upon a directed verdict. The notice of appeal is directed exclusively to this judgment. In fact, the clerk’s transcript shows no entry of an order or judgment of non-suit. After the appeal was taken the original plaintiff, Luiggia Beffa, died, and the present plaintiff, the executor, was substituted. The word “plaintiff” will refer to the original plaintiff. ■
The…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Morris v. JohnstoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Vigus v. O'BannonIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- County of Sonoma v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Sunter v. SunterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Royal Thrift & Loan Co. v. County Escrow, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Fisher v. LoseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Nulaid Farmers Assn. v. LaTorreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967