Legal Opinion

Haswell v. Costellenos

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1932No. Docket No. 7933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J., pro tem.

The trial of this case was by jury. While the appellant complains of a nonsuit as to certain counts of the complaint there was a judgment, general in its terms, entered in favor of defendant surety company upon a directed verdict. The notice of appeal is directed exclusively to this judgment. In fact, the clerk’s transcript shows no entry of an order or judgment of non-suit. After the appeal was taken the original plaintiff, Luiggia Beffa, died, and the present plaintiff, the executor, was substituted. The word “plaintiff” will refer to the original plaintiff. ■

The…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Morris v. JohnstoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  2. Vigus v. O'BannonIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. County of Sonoma v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Sunter v. SunterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Royal Thrift & Loan Co. v. County Escrow, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Fisher v. LoseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Nulaid Farmers Assn. v. LaTorreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API