Legal Opinion

Anne Arundel County v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 21, 2015No. 29/14PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.

Respondents in this matter, as plaintiffs, challenged in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County the adoption in 2011 by the County Council for Anne Arundel County of a comprehensive zoning ordinance for a large portion of Anne Arundel County. In order to maintain their litigation, they must demonstrate appropriate standing to do so. Respondents assert that property owner standing principles apply to a judicial challenge to comprehensive zoning legislation and that they satisfied those principles. We disagree. Plaintiffs wishing to challenge in Maryland courts the legislative action…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Mayor of Baltimore v. GillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. Mayor and Council of Rockville v. Rylyns Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Montgomery County v. Woodward & Lothrop, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Bryniarski v. Montgomery County Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Cassel v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. County Council v. Zimmer Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  2. County Council of Prince George's County v. Chaney Enterprises Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  3. Vito v. GrueffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  4. Floyd v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  5. Sharon Bauer v. Marc ElrichCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API