State v. Tilghman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge.
*717 Anthony Marcellious Tilghman ("Defendant") appeals from an order denying his pro se motion for postconviction DNA testing and to locate and preserve evidence. Defendant contends the trial court erred by: (1) denying his motion for DNA testing prior to ordering and receiving an inventory of all physical and biological evidence; and (2) denying his motion because he sufficiently established his entitlement to appointment of counsel. We dismiss in part and affirm in part.
I. Factual and Procedural History
On 8 September 2014, in accordance with a plea agreement,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Viar v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. MacKeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ByersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- State v. ByersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018