Legal Opinion
Gold v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 6, 2011No. SD 30608PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM W. FRANCIS, JR., Judge.
Nicolian M. Gold (“Movant”) seeks review of the motion court’s denial of his amended motion for post-conviction relief. Movant alleges he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We affirm the order of the motion court.
Facts and Procedural History
On February 8, 2007, Movant was charged by information with three counts of class A felony robbery in the first degree, by threatening the immediate use of a dangerous instrument in violation of section 569.020, 1 and one count of class C felony tampering in the first degree, by taking an automobile without the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shackleford v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Chaney v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hao v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Conley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Reid v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lynn v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Nichols v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- May v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Rivers v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Deante L. Harris, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.