Legal Opinion
Hao v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 29, 2002No. ED 79914PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM H. CRANDALL, JR., Presiding Judge.
Stuart M. Hao (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief without a hearing. Movant contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that his counsel was ineffective for misinforming him that he would be paroled after serving 15 percent of his sentence. Because we find Movant satisfied the requirements to obtain a hearing on his claim, we reverse and remand for a hearing.
- On October 6, 2000, Movant pleaded guilty to the Class B felony of child abuse in violation of section 568.060.3(1), RSMo…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. ErvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Webb v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- Simmons v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Savage v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Fogle v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Reid v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.