McFayden v. Town of Calistoga
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The complaint alleges that on the twenty-fifth day of November, 1919, “the plaintiff delivered to the defendant for hire” a truck; that continuously thereafter until the sixth day of September, 1920, the defendant “had the possession of said truck, and during such period of time used the same on and upon the public streets and highways of said town, and in the municipal work thereof; that, on or about the said 6th day of September, 1920, defendant notified plaintiff that it would redeliver the possession of said truck to him, and thereupon plaintiff did receive the possession thereof from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. Town of OntarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Arthur v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Chester v. CarmichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Buck v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Le Strange v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Holmes Packaging MacH. Corp. v. BinghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Pugh-Miller Drilling Co. v. Main Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929