Lovell v. Rowan Mutual Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice:
As the Court of Appeals recognized, this case presents a question of first impression in this State. Simply stated, the issue here is whether the innocent wife can recover under an insurance policy issued to her husband, which insures property owned by them as tenants by the entirety, when the loss by fire resulted from intentional burning of the property by the husband. Relying mainly on the special incidents of a tenancy by the entirety, the Court of Appeals held the wife’s recovery barred by the actions of her husband. We reverse. Proper application of the more relevant…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Vasilion v. VasilionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- Steigler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
- Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Howell v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. WarrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Maravich v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. MolloyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Republic Insurance Co. v. JerniganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Kulubis v. Texas Farm Bureau Underwriters Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.