Bowers v. Schell's Bakery
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The claimant in this workmen’s compensation case is admittedly totally disabled. The disability is due to a coronary occlusion. The main question before the compensation authorities was whether the coronary occlusion was brought about by the exertion of pushing a half-ton bread truck, half-filled with bread, in order to start it when the mechanical starter would not work, or was the natural result of a diseased condition of his heart and arteries. That was a pure question of fact, the decision of which rested on the final fact-finding body, the board. There was competent medical…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Good v. Pennsylvania Department of Property & SuppliesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Johnson v. Valvoline Oil Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Icenhour v. Freedom Oil Works Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Russell v. Scott Paper Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lind v. Argo Lamp Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Revilak v. Coca Cola Co. of Pa.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Smith v. A. De O. Rossiter & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Carl v. American Window Glass Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Rodgers v. P. G. Publishing Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.