Legal Opinion

Smith v. A. De O. Rossiter & Sons Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1945No. Appeal, 4PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

Claimant presented a petition for compensation as the widow of a deceased employee of defendant. The referee awarded compensation, having concluded that deceased sustained an accident in the course of his employment, as the result of which he died. The TVork-men’s Compensation Board, on appeal by defendant and its insurance carrier, reversed the referee and dismissed the claim petition. In doing so the board vacated the 6th and 11th findings of fact and the second conclusion of law of the referee, 1 and substituted therefore the following:

“Sixth: That nothing of an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Good v. Pennsylvania Department of Property & SuppliesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Kline v. KiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Apker v. Crown Can Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Powell v. Hills GarageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Corrento v. VentrescaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. Patterson-Emerson-Comstock, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Cope v. Philadelphia Toilet Laundry & Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Banks v. BrazzeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API