Legal Opinion

Hull v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 11, 1949No. 9744PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a resident of California, appeals from a judgment against her in her suit against the defendant, a national bank, located in Illinois, to recover a deficiency tax of $10,000 assessed against the estate of Emma Hull, deceased, with interest thereon and attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in connection therewith. The issue in the District Court and now upon review is a rather simple one, depending for its solution upon whether defendant, as executor, in settling the inheritance and estate taxes upon the estate of George Firmenich, deceased, was justified, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lyeth v. HoeySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Pasadena Research Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  4. Howard v. SwiftIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Hood v. Commonwealth Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. John v. CARR & SON, INC. v. UNITED STATESUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  2. Burri Ex Rel. Carpenter v. CampbellArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Precision Components, Inc. v. Estate of KuntzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. United States v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1955
  5. John v. CARR & SON, INC. v. UNITED STATESUnited States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API