Legal Opinion

Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. City of Lansing

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1939No. Docket No. 146, Calendar No. 40,728PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

This is an action in replevin.

A shipment of slot machines in the course of interstate commerce from Baltimore, Maryland, to a consignee at Lansing, Michigan, was carried to Lansing in part of the transit by plaintiff railroad company and delivered to one, not the bill-of-lading consignee, upon the assertion that he represented the consignee.

Upon the bill-of-lading consignee demanding the shipment, denying the validity of the delivery made, it was for the carrier to regain possession and to make delivery to the consignee or show there had been proper delivery. In order to regain possession of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Heyman v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. STATE, EX REL. WASHTENAW COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. AlickiMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. In Re Estate of WeisenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Harford Metal Products Corp. v. Tidewater Express Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  5. STATE, EX REL. WASHTENAW COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API