Legal Opinion

Rodenberg v. Rodenberg

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1965No. 3687PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge:

After entering into a separation agreement, the parties hereto were divorced in the State of Florida in 1954. The agreement by reference was incorporated into the divorce decree. In 1956 the parties entered into an amendatory agreement, and with their consent the divorce decree was amended in accordance with the amendatory agreement. Under the amended decree the former husband was obligated to pay his former wife $400 a month until her death or remarriage. He complied with the agreement until 1960. The former wife then sued him in the Domestic Relations Branch of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ellen L. Thomason v. William R. ThomasonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  2. Sarah S. Wagner v. Charles A. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  3. Kathryn W. Meredith v. Richard H. MeredithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  4. Hitchcock v. ThomasonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Gaissert v. GaissertDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howze v. HowzeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Brown v. DyerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Frances C. Den v. Alfred A. J. DenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. Rodenberg v. HatfieldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API