Legal Opinion
Dye v. Pompeo
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 14, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2019-1645Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RICHARD WAYNE DYE, Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 19-1645 (CKK) MICHAEL RICHARD POMPEO, et al., Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION (November 14, 2019) Plaintiff Richard Wayne Dye brings a claim of retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against Michael Richard Pompeo, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of State (“State Department”), and Miracle Systems, LLC. Plaintiff contends that Defendants retaliated against him by terminating his employment after he complained about a hostile…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- National Labor Relations Board v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.