Legal Opinion

Long v. Natarajan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 5, 2008No. A08A0040PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.

Sandra Long and her husband (“the Longs”) brought an action for battery, loss of consortium, and punitive damages against Dr. Radha Srinivasan Natarajan after Dr. Srinivasan1 removed tissue from Long’s buttock during surgery on Long’s neck and shoulder. The trial court granted Dr. Srinivasan’s motion for summary judgment, finding that the procedure was permitted under the terms of the consent form Long signed before her surgery. The trial court also excluded the Longs’ expert affidavit. The Longs appeal and, for reasons that follow, we affirm.

1. At the outset, we note…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Cotten v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. All Fleet Refinishing, Inc. v. West Georgia National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. McDowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Callaway v. O'ConnellDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2014
  3. In the Interest of A. R.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Long v. NatarajanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. MAXINE E. FERGUSON v. KENNESTONE HOSPITAL, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API