Legal Opinion
Christopher Fountain v. Rodney Steven II, et al.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 21, 2026No. 5:26-cv-04079Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS CHRISTOPHER FOUNTAIN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 26-4079-AJP-BGS RODNEY STEVEN II, et al., Defendants. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FOR DISMISSAL Plaintiff Christopher Fountain filed this action pro se and has been provisionally granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis for purposes of screening. The Court therefore may screen the Complaint and dismiss it if it fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Complaint fails to state intelligibly which Defendant allegedly committed which act in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Louise Whitney v. State of New Mexico Charles Patrick, Employee of the State of New Mexico John/jane Doe, Unknown Employees of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Nasious v. Two Unknown B.I.C.E. AgentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Dennis Wayne Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Kay v. BemisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.