Legal Opinion

Dow Chemical Co. v. Ebling

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 2000No. 22A05-9812-CV-625Published

1Opinion of the Court

723 N.E.2d 881 (2000)

The DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, Dowelanco n/k/a Dow Agrosciences LLC, Eli Lilly & Company Rofan Services, Inc. and Epco, Inc., Appellants-Defendants,

Louisville Chemical Company, Inc., Appellant-Defendant,

Affordable Pest Control, Inc., Appellant-Defendant,

v.

Todd EBLING and Cynthia Ebling, individually and Husband and Wife, and as Parents of Christina Ebling and Alex Ebling, Appellees-Plaintiffs.

No. 22A05-9812-CV-625.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

February 3, 2000.

Janet Barbre Norton, Dow AgroSciences, LLC, Stanley C. Fickle, Robert D. MacGill, Dean T. Barnhard, Joseph G. Eaton,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API