United States v. Burdulis
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KAYATTA, Circuit Judge.
Paul Burdulis was convicted of possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B) after the police found such pornography on a thumb drive (a kind of data storage device) in his home. To show that the pornography was “produced using materials which have been ... shipped or transported” in interstate commerce, as required by the statute, the prosecution relied solely on an inscription on the thumb drive stating, “Made in China.” We agree with the district court that copying pornography onto a thumb drive is “producing]” pornography under the statute,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- National Federation of Independent Business v. SebeliusSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Florida v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. BolesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- United States v. JoubertCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Flora Andrea Rodriguez Asalde v. First Class Parking Systems LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. HabibiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Bradley v. SugarbakerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.