Legal Opinion
Reddell v. California Coastal Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 2009No. B206428PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERREN, J.
Dan Reddell filed a petition for a writ of administrative and ordinary mandate and a complaint for damages and equitable relief against the California' Coastal Commission (Commission). Reddell sought an order requiring the Commission to set aside its decision denying him a coastal development permit under the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Pub. Resources Code, § 30000 et seq.) (Coastal Act). The trial court denied the petition for writ of mandate and dismissed the complaint. We affirm.
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The City of Monro Bay (City) approved permits to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Yost v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Collection Bureau of San Jose v. RumseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Klein v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Ross v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Bottini v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Kalnel Gardens, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Hubbard v. Coastal Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.