Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Frank Costello

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 5, 1955No. 83, Docket 23149Published

1ConcurrenceFrank, Circuit Judge

1. Judge HAND finds that the sole evidence before the grand jury was hearsay. Accordingly, we do not have a case where, in addition to hearsay, there was other evidence of an unimpeachable character. Judge HAND holds that, nevertheless, the indictment cannot be questioned. This leaves me in some doubt.

I entirely agree that the hearsay rule is undesirable. I think it would be well if the rule were revised so that, at a trial, the question of its admissibility would be left to the discretion of the trial judge. But, although courts may make desirable modifications of many of the exclusionary…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Egan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Hoffman v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. United States v. FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  5. United States v. ValentiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API