Legal Opinion

Bland v. Holden

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1970No. 69-847PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action in habeas corpus originating in this court. Petitioner’s contention is that he is being held under excessive bail, contrary to the provisions of Section 9 of Article I of the Ohio Constitution.

Petitioner is under indictment on 17 counts as follows: five counts of rape, five counts of armed robbery, five counts of breaking and entering, one count of burglary of an inhabited dwelling and one count of malicious entry. The five counts of rape, robbery and breaking and entering all arose out of the same five transactions. His bail is set at $45,000.

The purpose of bail is to…

2Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. TibbettsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. NieldsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Jenkins v. BillyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In Re GentryOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API