Dill v. Ebey
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of this court to review judgments of the state court under § 709, Rev., Stat., and Judicial Code, §.237, and whether a Federal question exists and was properly and specially set up in the state court, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney
This writ of error brings before us a judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma, affirming a judgment rendered by the District Court of Okfuskee County, holding the plaintiff in error liable for the amount of an unpaid subscription made by him to the capital stock of a bank of which the defendant in error is the Receiver.
The case is brought here under § 709, Rev. Stat., Judicial Code, § 237, and the jurisdictional question is raised.
The action was commenced in the United States court for the Western District of the Indian Territory on September 17, 1906, by Ebey, as receiver of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Choctaw Electric Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- W. G. Blanchard & Co. v. EzellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Garnsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oswego Falls Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
- Kainea v. KreugerHawaii Supreme Court · 1929
- Woner v. LewisDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1935