Legal Opinion

Dornfeld v. Oberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 23, 1993No. C2-92-216, C8-92-219PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

This case raises the issue of whether a cause of action exists for intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress where a person claims to have suffered severe emotional distress as a result of being present at the death of a family member.

Respondent Barbara Dornfeld brought suit against appellants Scott Oberg and American Family Insurance Company, claiming both negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress arising out of a motor vehicle accident in which her husband was killed. Following a jury trial, the jury awarded respondent damages for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Purcell v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Stadler v. CrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Okrina v. Midwestern CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Estate of Heiser v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. Standard Fruit & Vegetable Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Peterson v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. Bettis v. Islamic RepublicCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  5. Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API