Hivick v. Turben
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Cotton County; Cham Jones, Judge. Action by L. C. Hivick against I. E. Tur-ben and A. R. Jones. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was an action, commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff -below, against the defendants in error, defendants below, for the purpose of quieting his title 10 and in certain real estate alleged to be held by him as the assignee of a certain oil and gas lease. Upon trial to the court there was judgment for the defendants for costs, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced.
It seems that the defendant in error Tur-ben was the owner of an oil and gas lease covering a certain tract of land situated in Ootton county: that on the-22nd day of March, 1916. Turben assigned 40…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Cordilla v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Fontenot v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Burke v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Franco-American Securities, Ltd. v. GuillotSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Turk v. WarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942