Legal Opinion

De Cecchis v. Evers

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 18, 1961No. 560PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carey, J.:

The question presently before the Court is whether a limitation of liability contained in a Warehouse Receipt is binding upon the plaintiffs.

The point arose during a pretrial conference. It appearing that a decision thereon might well shorten the trial or possibly eliminate its necessity, the Court under Civil Rule 16, Del. C. Ann. directed the filing of briefs.

Plaintiffs expect to prove these facts:

In June 1956, Mrs. De Cecchis called the office of defendants by telephone and inquired about their rates for storage. A member of the firm told her the rates which he quoted were based…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colgin v. Security Storage & Van Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  2. Josloff v. FalbournSupreme Court of Delaware · 1924
  3. Brasch v. Sloan's Moving & Storage Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. French v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  5. Unruh v. TaylorSuperior Court of Delaware · 1899

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance v. Rutledge & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2000
  2. J.W.S. Delavau, Inc. v. Eastern America Transport & Warehousing, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Haft v. Dart Group Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
  4. Miller v. Newsweek, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
  5. In re Argon Credit, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API