Legal Opinion

Roebuck v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co., Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1973No. 6552PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants’ amended complaint 1 asserted three claims: (1) damages for the loss of the use and enjoyment of certain furniture which appellee had sold them in 1967 under a conditional sales contract and repossessed in 1968 during the course of obtaining a default judgment 2 in an action of replevin brought under D.C.Code 1967, § 16-3701 et seq., now attacked by appellants as unconstitutional, and therefore without force and effect, because of alleged lack of due process; (2) damages for appellee’s wrongful conversion of the furniture; and (3) damages for appellee’s disposal of the furniture…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Sam Title, AKA Sam Teitelman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  4. Clarence Austin v. Otis SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  5. Elgin Nat. Watch Co. v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. S. M. Flickinger Co. v. 18 Genesee Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. FARMERS STATE BANK IN AFTON v. BallewCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Threatt v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Dakota Bank & Trust Co. of Bismarck v. ReedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. In re C. A. P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API