Lasercomb America, Inc. v. Job Reynolds Larry Holliday, and Holiday Steel Rule Die Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SPROUSE, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Larry Holliday and Job Reynolds appeal from a district court judgment holding them liable to appellee Lasercomb America, Inc., for copyright infringement and for fraud, based on appellants’ unauthorized copying and marketing of appel-lee’s software. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for recomputation of damages.
I
Facts and Proceedings Below
Appellants and defendants below are Larry Holliday, president and sole shareholder of Holiday Steel Rule Die Corporation (Holiday Steel), and Job Reynolds, a computer programmer for that company. 1 Appellee is…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Alcatel Usa, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Dgi Technologies, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.