Mednick v. Precor, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Harry D. Leinenweber, Judge
Plaintiffs Gary Mednick and Steven Bayer’s Renewed Motion for Class Certification [ECF No. 149] is granted in part and denied in part. The Court certifies Plaintiffs’ proposed class for the purpose of determining liability, but it reserves the issue of damages for individual hearings. The Court appoints Mednick and Bayer as class representatives and the attorneys representing them as class counsel.
I. LEGAL STANDARD
Plaintiffs here seek to certify a class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3). See, ECF No. 149 at 14. As such,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Benson v. Newell Brands Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Burger v. Spark Energy, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Craftwood Lumber Company v. Essendant, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Freedom Transportation, Inc. v. Navistar International CorporationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
- James Beyer, Collin Smothers, Mateen Zafer, Corey Davis, and Dashawn Bell, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. DraftKings, Inc., and Crown IL Gaming Inc. d/b/a DraftKings, Casino Queen Inc., and Northside Crown Gaming LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.