Wiesel v. Ashcraft
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
Appellant Wiesel filed a complaint in the trial court to set aside the sheriff’s sale of his home to appellees. We believe the court below acted correctly when it entered summary judgment for appellees and, therefore, we affirm.
To determine if there is a genuine issue as to any material facts, we must resolve all inferences to be drawn from the evidence in favor of appellant. Rule 56(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. Dollar A Day Rent a Car Systems, Inc. v. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co., 22 Ariz.App. 270, 526 P.2d 1068 (1974). On January 30, 1969, Robert N.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Graffam v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Nussbaumer v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF YUMAArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Daru v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Haymes v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- McCoy v. BrooksArizona Supreme Court · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re KrohnArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Mason v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Hogan v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Homecraft Corp. v. FimbresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Browning v. PalmerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.