State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Drewry
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
BARKSDALE, District Judge.
Since I have come to the conclusion that defendants’ motion to dismiss this action must be overruled, I will set out briefly my reasons for this conclusion.
First, as to the matter of jurisdiction : Counsel for defendants contend that this court is without jurisdiction of this action because, in an interpleader action under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1335, the court only has jurisdiction where the adverse claimants to a fund admittedly owing by plaintiff are of diverse citizenship. This contention of defendants would be sound if plaintiff relied for jurisdiction upon 28 U.S.C.A. §…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of ThibodauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Harrison v. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored PeopleSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Martin v. CreasySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. KraftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stevens v. American Service Mutual Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Hobbs v. Buckeye Union Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1962
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. WellsDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1962
- Home Insurance Company v. MonacoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Government Employees Insurance v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.