Legal Opinion
Payne v. TK Auto Wholesalers
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 28, 2006No. AC 26771PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The pro se plaintiff, Tyrone E. Payne, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his action against the defendant, TK Auto Wholesalers, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. He claims that the court improperly concluded that he lacked standing. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court.
*535This appeal exemplifies that, in appellate adjudication, it is the law that must prevail, rather than any particular party. The fascinating facts are as follows.1 On February 7, 2003, the plaintiff headed to the defendant’s premises with the aim of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Associated Investment Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Williams Associates IVSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Ganim v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Amore v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Label Systems Corp. v. Samad AghamohammadiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Cadle Co. v. D'AddarioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. PayneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Duso v. GrotonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- State v. PeruginiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014